1. Introduction
Financial accounts and non-financial national accounts by institutional sector rely on a very wide range of elementary statistics. This information is then transformed through a number of methodological steps, to compile data that follow the definitions and valuations of the European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA 95).
The impact of International Accounting Standards (IAS), applied to companies in the EU, on ESA 95 data will generally follow an indirect path. There will be a first impact on elementary statistical sources, and only later an impact on the methodologies of transformation and aggregation. To be more precise, there will be many indirect paths, one for each Member State of the EU.
The introduction of IAS implies a discontinuity in elementary statistical sources. This will be later counterbalanced by an increase in the harmonisation of the statistical information. However, the discontinuity cannot be ignored, and careful preparatory work must be made.
This planning ahead can be centralised for some aspects, but many activities will take place at the local level. Both the preparation for the change and the change itself will require extra resources at many organisational levels.
Eurostat units C1 (National Accounts) and C3 (Public Finance and Taxation)) have so far co-operated closely, to ensure that both National Accounts Working Group (NAWG) and Financial Accounts Working Group (FAWG) have received compatible information for reflection. A common activity was a joint questionnaire on IAS circulated in December 2002. One outcome of this questionnaire was the suggestion by some countries that Eurostat would do some methodological work to compare the definitions and valuations in both IAS and ESA 95. Such a work was undertaken, and separate documents were presented to the meetings of the FAWG and NAWG in 2003.
2. Financial accounts
2.1. General
The most relevant IAS for ESA 95 financial accounts are IAS 30, 32 and 39. The last two are extremely important. It has to be said at the start that there are both similarities and differences between IAS and ESA. We will concentrate here on four broad categories of differences:
classification of financial assets and liabilities: ESA 95 and IAS 30 are unrelated.
maturity breakdown: original maturity in ESA 95, residual maturity in IAS.
netting of financial assets and liabilities: gross recording in ESA 95, net reporting in IAS under some conditions.
valuation: in ESA 95 market price for most assets, but not for deposits, loans and other accounts receivable or payable (as they are not marketable); under IAS 39 all financial assets measured at fair value.
A more complete exposition of the differences and similarities between IAS and ESA 95 for financial accounts is given in paragraph 2.2.. Without entering in all the technical details, it seems fair to conclude that the adoption of IAS will not provide data that can be used immediately to produce financial accounts by institutional sector. In most cases, some methodological adjustments will have to be devised. So we will have a process of transformation of the elementary statistics that it is conceptually similar to what we have today, but the detail will differ considerably.
Two issues can be raised on this process of transformation:
its level of difficulty;
the quality of data produced.
To get a tentative reply we also have to distinguish at least to two big institutional sectors: non-financial corporations and financial corporations.
Our opinion is that for non-financial corporations the transformation will be easier than it is today, insofar as book values move closer to market values and will be more comparable internationally. The transformation will be of better quality from a European perspective.
For financial corporations the prospect is less clear, at least because IAS 32 and 39, so relevant for banks, are still under discussion. Probably we will have data of a quality similar to that that we have today, but this will require some efforts to secure.
2.2 Technical comparison between International Accounting Standards and ESA 95 financial accounts (ESA 95 references between brackets)
This analysis assesses the comparability of the relevant IAS standards with the ESA 95 financial accounts. It covers the most relevant IAS standards from ESA 95 financial accounts point of view. These appear to be IAS 30 (Disclosures in the financial statements of banks and similar financial institutions), IAS 32 (Financial instruments: Disclosure and presentation) and especially IAS 39 (Financial instruments: recognition and measurement). Other standards that may be relevant are IAS 1 (Presentation of financial statements), IAS 14 (Segment reporting information) and IAS 21 (The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates).
The comparison is based on the existing versions of the IAS. Some of these standards are however, expected to be amended, in particular IAS 39. Presumably the proposed amendments to IAS 39 may considerably broaden the application of fair values. As much as possible, these expected changes to IAS 39 are taken into account in the analysis.
Disclosure and presentation (IAS 30 and IAS 32)
IAS 30 contains comprehensive rules for the disclosures in the financial statements of banks and similar financial institutions – including the income statement, the balance sheet and off-balance sheet positions (contingencies and commitments). IAS 32 contains further rules for the disclosure and presentation of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments affecting the enterprise’s financial position.
IAS 30 requires financial institutions to present a balance sheet that groups assets and liabilities by nature and list them reflecting their relative liquidity. The classification of financial assets and liabilities in ESA 95 is primarily based on liquidity and legal characteristics.
In terms of the breakdown by maturity, a significant difference appears between IAS 30 and ESA 95. Whereas IAS 30 requires residual maturity, the ESA 95 (5.22) requires breakdown into original maturity where applicable.
IAS32 contains additional requirements concerning the disclosure of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments in enterprises’ financial information. The most important components are the distinction between equity and financial liabilities in the balance sheet of the issuer, the netting of financial assets and liabilities and the disclosure requirements for financial instruments.
The following terms are specified in IAS 32:
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset of one enterprise and a financial liability or equity instrument of another enterprise.
A financial asset is any asset that is:
A financial liability is any liability that is a contractual obligation:
Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or a liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.
Market value is the amount obtainable from the sale, or payable on the acquisition, of a financial instrument in an active market.
ESA 95 defines financial assets as economic assets, comprising means of payment, financial claims and economic assets that are close to financial claims in nature (7.20).
Means of payment consist of monetary gold, special drawing rights, currency and transferable deposits. Financial claims entitle their owners (creditors) to receive a payment or series of payments without any counter-performance from other institutional units (debtors) who have incurred the counterpart liabilities. Examples of economic assets which are close to financial assets in nature are shares and other equity and partly contingent assets (7.21).
Apart from the fact that the ESA 95 has a broader application than IAS, comprising financial structures of all institutional units of the economies, the definitions of financial assets and liabilities appear relatively compatible.
Regarding the rules for distinguishing between liabilities and equity, IAS 32 requires to classify a liability or equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangement on initial recognition and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument. A liability requires the issuer to deliver financial assets to the holder under terms that are unfavourable to the issuer. Otherwise it is an equity instrument.
IAS32 also requires that financial instruments, which contain both a liability and an equity element, be classified separately. For instance, a bond or similar instrument convertible by the holder into common shares of the issuer is an example of such an instrument. From the perspective of the issuer, such an instrument comprises two components: a financial liability (a contractual arrangement to deliver cash or other financial assets) and an equity instrument (a call option granting the holder the right, for a specified period of time, to convert into common shares of the issuer). ESA 95 does not mention this explicitly. However, in case of debentures and loan stock convertible into shares of the issuing corporation or another corporation the conversion option, where separable from the underlying bond, should be regarded as a separate financial instrument (5.62).
Regarding the rules in IAS32 for netting financial assets and liabilities, there are differences with ESA 95 due to the fact that IAS ‘requires’ net reporting if the necessary conditions are met, whereas ESA 95 recommends gross recording (with a few exceptions).
Recognition and measurement (IAS 32 and IAS 39)
IAS 39 establishes principles for recognising, measuring (valuation), and disclosing information about financial assets and financial liabilities. The standard supplements the disclosure provisions of IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation. As currently drafted, all financial assets and liabilities are recognised on the balance sheet. This includes also all derivatives, regardless of the purpose for which they are held.
For the purpose of measuring a financial asset subsequent to initial recognition, IAS 39 classifies financial assets into four categories:
All financial assets are measured at 'fair value', except for the following, which should be measured at amortised cost:
ESA 95 states as a general rule that all assets and liabilities are to be valued using current market prices on the date to which the balance sheet relates (7.25). This applies also to financial assets. Financial assets and liabilities should in principle be valued at current prices. They should be assigned the same value whether they appear as financial assets or liabilities (7.44). But as a matter of fact current market prices are only applicable to assets that are marketable. ESA 95 does not mention the definition of "marketability". However from a general point of view, a contingent asset is a financial asset because it is tradable or can be offset on the market (7.22). Hence, as a practical approach, the fact that the price of a financial asset is negotiable can be taken as a prerequisite for marketability.
Given this definition the following financial assets have no current market prices:
ESA 95 states that ideally, current market prices should be prices observable on the market. When there are no observable prices an attempt has to be made to estimate what the prices would be if the assets were acquired on the market on balance sheet date (7.26). ESA 95 suggests also that current prices may be approximated by re-valuing a) and accumulating acquisitions less disposals; or b) by the present, or discounted, value of future returns (7.27).
Similarly, the best measure of fair value is a quoted market price in an open market. However, IAS 39 recognises that ‘fair value’ cannot be readily determined for most financial assets classified as available for sale or held for trading. And it provides guidance for determining fair value in the absence of quoted prices. Hence, it can be assumed that fair values are frequently the result of various estimation methods.
ESA 95 does not define the concept of fair value. Moreover, fair valuation may raise some consistency problems between the valuation of assets and corresponding liabilities of creditors and debtors. Nevertheless, in cases of absence of observable market prices, the fair valuation may be derived, as a best approximation not far removed from market valuation.
IAS 39 requires deposits to be recorded at cost value unless they are held for trading, where they should be recorded at fair value. In fact, as deposits are not traded in the same way as loans (unless negotiable instruments are issued), cost values will in practice be equivalent to nominal values and fair values are unlikely to be adopted. However, the proposed change to IAS 39 mentioned above could have an impact on deposit liabilities as it would permit the initial designation of deposits at fair value regardless of whether they are traded or not.
ESA 95 recommends the use of principal amounts (see above). These values may include accrued interest.
Loans
Under IAS 39, loans should be measured at amortised cost with the exception of loans not originated by the enterprise and those held for trading purposes, which are to be recorded at fair value.
The proposed amendment to IAS 39 would further increase the range of loans that are recorded at fair value by permitting entities to measure any financial asset or liability at fair value, by designating it at initial recognition as held for trading. In this respect IAS 39 deviates from ESA 95 which recommends loans to be recorded at principal value in the balance sheets of both creditors and debtors.
In the case of traded loans ESA 95 specifies that "where a loan becomes negotiable on an organised market, it is to classify in the category securities other than shares"(5.79) and thus valued at market price. In paragraph 6.62j, ESA 95 defines as securities other than shares, "loans that have become negotiable de facto".
In terms of the recognition of non-performing loans, under the proposed amendment to IAS 39 outlined in the exposure draft, all financial assets (including loans held to maturity and those originated by the reporting agent) are to be subject to an "impairment test" at each balance sheet date. If it is probable that the holder of a financial asset will not be able to collect all of the principal or interest amounts due according to the contractual terms, an impairment or bad debt loss needs to be recorded. Hence, the proposed amendment to the IAS 39 is likely to further increase the number of loans recorded at a value different from (lower than) the principal value.
ESA 95 recommends that loans are "recorded gross of all provisions for bad debt, which are treated as book-keeping entries that are internal to the institutional producer and do not appear anywhere in the system (4.165 f)". In this respect the IAS39 represents a further deviation from the ESA 95 standard.
Holdings of negotiable securities
IAS 39 requires fair values to be used for all securities that are held for trading or are available for sale. Securities that are held to maturity and unquoted shares are to be valued at amortised cost. In ESA 95 it is recommended that holdings of securities be recorded at fair (market) values regardless of the purpose for which they are held.
Financial derivatives (both assets and liabilities).
IAS 39 requires all derivatives to be recognised on the balance sheet at their fair values, with the exception of those derivatives that are to be held to maturity that should be recorded at cost. ESA95 only recognises those derivatives that have a market value because they are tradable or can be offset on the market. ESA 95 recommends that all financial derivatives that are recognised on the balance sheet should be recorded at fair (market) value. In the case that no quoted market price exists, a financial derivative should be valued at either the amount required to buy out or to offset the contract of the premium paid (7.50).
Insurance technical reserves
ESA 95 makes reference to the Insurance Accounting Directive of December 1991 that requires that, ‘current’ value of investments shall be disclosed in the accounts, or in notes to the accounts (Article 46). The current value is defined as the market value if there is a regulated market, and as the likely realisable value otherwise (Article 48). However, it is not clear whether liabilities arising from insurance contracts are financial instruments from an IAS point of view, and hence whether these should be recorded at fair value.
Time of recording
Concerning the time of recording of transactions, IAS 39 permits either trade or settlement day recording. Certain value changes between trade and settlement dates are recognised for purchases if settlement date accounting is used. ESA 95 recommends "financial transactions and their counterpart transactions to be recorded at the same point in time" (5.142), without specifying if trade or settlement date are to be used.
Exchange rates (IAS21)
Regarding the exchange rate applied to convert financial assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency into national currency, IAS21 requires the use of end-month exchange rates. The ESA 95 recommendations are similar requiring that opening and closing balance sheet values must be converted using exchange rates prevailing at the dates to which the balance sheets relate.
Flows (transactions)
IAS do not set out any particular rules for the recording of flows. The calculations of transactions might primarily only be affected indirectly as they are frequently derived from stock data. Changes in fair value should, however, according to IAS 39 be recognised in the income statement, excluding fees, commissions and other transaction costs. To what extent these will effectively translate into revaluation adjustments needed for ESA 95 financial accounts depends on how greatly the breakdown into gains or losses in the income statement performed. The coverage of the revaluation effects are likely to increase if the broader use of fair values is used, as outlined in the draft exposure of IAS 39.
3 Non-financial national accounts
3.1. General
This paragraph contains a comparison of selected IAS with the relevant requirements in ESA95. The analysis is based on the IAS in their current form, and focuses on those aspects of IAS which are relevant for ESA95; certain contents of IAS, and certain IAS, are ignored for the purposes of this comparison. Where appropriate the "Standing Interpretations Committee" interpretations have been used for the practical application of certain IAS.
It is important to recall that the fundamental principles of national accounts are similar to those long used in business accounting (recognised in the SNA) and the IAS do not deviate from the fundamental principles which have been in most accounting regimes for a number of years. Where business accounts and national accounts have had to treat new phenomena, they have usually come to the same or similar conclusions. In most cases the differences between IAS and national accounts are well known, and statisticians will already be adjusting basic data sources for these.
One interesting point to note is that IAS sometimes provide certain flexibility in the standards that should be adopted by companies (for example IAS 1, 2, 16, 19, 21, 26). This is to be expected in a set of rules which have been agreed by international consensus. However it presents some difficulties for statisticians if they cannot obtain information for each company on the accounting option chosen.
For each of the comparisons, the IAS benchmark and alternative option is provided.
During the NAWG of 20-21 May 2003, Eurostat presented the analysis in paragraph 3.2. Several countries’ delegates stressed that the primary impact of the IAS will be on primary data sources, particularly annual business statistics, and therefore business statisticians should be undertaking significant and urgent preparatory work in this area. One country noted that there had been very useful national-level discussions between its statisticians and the national business accounting standards board, which had clarified a number of issues arising from IAS. Another country stressed that national accounts should not blindly follow business accounting standards – there are some distinctive differences between the requirements of corporate accounting and economic analysis – though there are practical data availability issues to be taken into account.
Eurostat surmised from the NAWG discussion that many countries’ national accountants have not yet had an opportunity to examine the IAS in detail, and strongly recommended that they start this process as soon as possible. Eurostat’s comparative analysis was necessarily quite general; to analyse the precise details in the IAS requires access to business accounting expertise and a clear understanding of the existing national business accounting standards.
Eurostat asked countries to provide any detailed comments on the ESA95/IAS comparisons after the meeting and noted that the IAS issue would again be discussed at the NAWG during its October meeting. Eurostat hopes that, by that point, more countries will have had an opportunity to look more deeply at IAS, and therefore the discussion can look into the most important accounting changes.
3.2. Technical comparison between International Accounting Standards and ESA 95 for non-financial accounts.
|
IAS1: Presentation of Financial Accounts
This IAS establishes minimum standards for the presentation of financial statements for all enterprises. Each statement must contain:
All statements should be prepared on a "going concern basis" and (except for cash flow statements) should be on an accruals basis.
Immaterial amounts should be aggregated with amounts of similar nature and do not need to be presented separately.
Assets/liabilites and income/expense should not be offset, unless an IAS allows it or unless immaterial. IAS18 contains provisions for revenue-related flows, and gains/losses may be reported net.
Assets should be separated on the balance sheet into current / non-current categories. Current assets are expected to be realised within 12 months (or held for consumption/sale) in normal operations, and are cash or cash-equivalent asset not restricted in use.
Balance sheets should separately identify (amongst others) property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, inventories and provisions. See IAS 16 for more on tangible assets.
The income statement should, as a minimum, show: revenue, results of operating activities, finance costs, tax expense, profit/loss from ordinary activities, extraordinary items, minority interest, and net profit/loss. Other breakdowns may be required by other IAS.
The notes to the financial accounts should at least include details of accounting policies which are covered by IAS.
|
ESA95 presented in the form of transaction accounts and balance sheets.
ESA95 is established on an accruals basis (para 1.57) except for certain transactions where cash is considered an acceptable approximation – for example, staff bonuses.
In theory there is no concept of "materiality" of the national accounts – all amounts should be presented in accordance with the breakdowns specified. ESA95 (paras 1.58 and 1.59) specifies gross recording of transactions and assets/liabilities between and within units, except where specifically implied by a definition or classification.
ESA95 distinguishes fixed assets, inventories and financial assets. There is no specific rule on the period during which inventories must be used.
ESA95 (annex 7.1) distinguishes between dwellings, other buildings, machinery and equipment, intangible assets and inventories (amongst others).
ESA95 requires data on output at basic prices, flows of property income and other distributive transactions. Extraordinary items may be part of other changes in assets (see analysis of IAS8) |
|
IAS2: Inventories
Inventories exclude any items where sale is "assured" – this will already be included with sales.
Inventories include goods for sale, work-in-progress and materials.
Inventories should be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value (the latter is net of costs to make the sale).
Any "abnormal losses" from inventories should be expensed.
The benchmark treatments for cost of inventories are either "First-in-First Out" or weighted average cost (the weighted average of the price of the item at the beginning and during the period).
The alternative approach for costs of inventories is "Last-in-First Out".
Financial statements must disclose the accounting policy used, and provide FIFO or net realisable value figures of the LIFO method has been used. |
ESA95 (para3.117) defines changes in inventories as the value of entries into inventories less the value of withdrawals and the value of any recurrent losses of goods held in inventories. Inventories consist of materials and supplies, work-in-progress, finished goods and goods for resale. ESA95 (para 7.37) says that inventories should be valued at prices prevailing on the date to which the balance sheet relates.
ESA95 (para 6.25) specifies that any exceptional losses from inventories should be treated as other changes in volume of assets (as K9). |
|
IAS8: Net profit or loss for the period, fundamental errors and changes in accounting policies
This IAS provides for disclosure of "extraordinary items" – examples given are earthquake damage and expropriation.
There must also be disclosure of write-downs, restructuring, asset disposals (including of property, plant and equipment), and litigation settlements.
Where fundamental errors are discovered in past periods, the benchmark approach is to adjust the current accounts and restate the figures for previous years. The alternative approach is to adjust the current year.
When IAS are adopted for the first time, the standards should be applied retrospectively and previous years restated. |
ESA95 includes these types of events in the other changes in volume of assets account.
ESA95 does not recognise the concept of provisions. It does have accounts for revaluations, and records disposals of assets negative in GFCF.
ESA95 revises previous years’ figures in the events of mistakes or new information. |
|
IAS10: Events after the balance sheet date
This IAS relates to events that take place the end of the reporting period and the time that the accounts are presented. For example a court case may resolve certain obligations of the enterprise which must be entered on the previous balance sheet. |
ESA95 does not recognise provisions. The available data should be the best at the time of compilation of the accounts. |
|
IAS11: Construction Contracts
Contract revenue should be measured as the initial amount of revenue agreed in the contract, adjusted for any variations if they will probably result in revenue and can be reliably measured.
Contract costs should include both directly attributable costs and suitably allocated overhead costs.
If the outcome can be reliably estimated, revenue and costs should be matched at the stages of completion.
Any expected losses on the contract should be recorded immediately. |
ESA95 (para 3.59) specifies that if a contract of sale is agreed in advance for the construction of a building, the output produced in each period is treated as being sold to the purchaser at the end of each period. The value of the output may be approximated by the stage payments made ine ach period.
ESA95 (para 3.52) says that for own-account construction, work-in-progress is estimated by applying the proportion of production costs incurred in the period to the estimated current basic price. ESA95 does not recognise provisions – output and consumption should be recorded on an accruals basis. |
|
IAS12: Income Taxes
This IAS specifies that current tax for current and prior periods should be recognised as a liability if unpaid, and any rights of tax recovery should be treated as an asset.
Deferred tax liabilities are defined as income taxes payable in future periods which relate to the differences between the existing tax base of assets or income/expenditure and the future tax liability arising from these assets or income/expenditure. A common case is when the purchase of an asset can be offset against tax in one period, but the stream of future benefits from the asset are taxable in a future period.
Tax assets and liabilities should be separately recorded in the balance sheet. |
ESA95 (para 4.82) says that current taxes on income, wealth etc are recorded at the time when activities, transactions or other events occur which create the liability to pay. |
|
IAS16: Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are defined in this IAS as (a) held by an enterprise for use in production…, for rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and (b) expected to be used during more than one period.
An item of property, plant and equipment should be recognised as an asset when it is probable that future economic benefits (risks and rewards) associated with the asset will flow to the enterprise, and the cost of the asset to the enterprise can be reliably measured.
Most spare parts and servicing equipment will be expensed as consumed, though major spare parts and stand-by equipment can be an asset if expected to be used over more than one period, or if they can only be used in connection with a particular asset.
An item of property, plant or equipment which is recognised as an asset should initially be measured at its cost. This cost includes costs of site preparation, initial delivery and handling costs, installation costs, professional fees and (if necessary under IAS37) provision for eventual dismantling and removal.
Subsequent expenditure relating to the asset should be added to the value of the asset if it is probable that this will create an increase in future economic benefits which will flow to the enterprise. Examples given include extending the useful life of an asset and upgrading a machine to increase quality of output.
After recognition, as an asset, property plant and machinery, the benchmark treatment is that should be valued at its cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. The alternative treatment is that these assets are valued at "fair value" (usually market value), with revaluations occurring simultaneously for similar types of asset, though not necessarily each year.
Depreciation should be recognised as an expense, unless it is incurred in the production of another asset. It should be allocated over the useful life of the asset according to the economic benefits given to the enterprise. The estimation of useful life of an asset is a matter of judgement based on experience.
Gains or losses on retirement or disposal of an asset should be recognised as income or expense in the income statement. |
ESA95 (para 3.102) defines fixed assets as produced outputs that are themselves used repeatedly, or continuously, in processes of production for more than one year.
ESA95 (para 3.111) specifies that the costs of ownership transfer of fixed and non-produced assets should be included in capital formation of the new owner of an asset. ESA95 specifies that gross capital formation is valued at purchasers’ prices.
ESA95 (para 3.107f) says that gross capital formation should include improvements to fixed assets which go well beyond the requirements of ordinary maintenance and repairs.
ESA95 (para 7.25) says that fixed assets are valued in the balance sheet as if they were acquired on the balance sheet date (ie. at market values).
ESA95 (para 6.02) defines consumption of fixed capital as amount of assets used up, during the period under consideration, as a result of normal wear and tear and foreseeable obsolescence. Consumption of fixed capital appears in the other changes in volume of assets account (and also in any net aggregates).
ESA95 (para 3.115) records sales of fixed assets in gross fixed capital formation at basic prices after deducting costs of ownership transfer |
|
IAS17: Leases
This IAS classifies leases as operating leases or finance leases depending on whether the risks and rewards incident to the ownership of the leased asset lie with the lessor or the lessee.
If the lease transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership to the lessee, then it is a finance lease. Otherwise it is an operating lease.
Finance leases would normally be defined in the following cases:
In the case of finance leases, the assets and liabilities associated with the lease should be recorded at fair value in the balance sheet of the lessee.
In the case of operating leases, lease payments should be recognised as an expense in the income statement of the lessee on a straight-line basis unless another systematic basis better matches the time pattern of the lessee’s benefit. |
ESA95 (annex II) distinguishes between operating and financial leases.
ESA95 specifies that if all risks and rewards of ownership of a durable good are, de facto though not de jure, transferred from lessor to lessee, the lease is a financial lease.
ESA95 specifies that for financial leasing the leasing period covers all, or most, of the economic life of the durable good. At the end of a finance lease the lessee often has the chance to buy the good at a nominal price. The Eurostat Manual on Deficit and Debt contains more guidance on leases in the context of public infrastructure.
ESA95 says that under a finance lease the durable good is treated as if it is owned by the lessee from the beginning of the leasing period.
ESA95 says that under a operating lease, rental payments received by the lessor are treated as output in his production account and as intermediate consumption in the accounts of the lessee, if it is a producer. |
|
IAS 18: Revenue
This IAS specifies that revenue includes only gross inflows of economic benefits received by an enterprise on its own account – it does not include amounts collected on behalf of third parties (eg. sales taxes).
Revenue should be measured at fair value of the consideration received or receivable, including any trade discounts or volume rebates.
When goods or services are exchanged for goods and services of a similar nature, the exchange is not regarded as a transaction which generates revenue.
Revenue is recognised when:
This timing of recognition can be different from the transfer of legal title.
Revenue in the form of interest, royalties and dividends should be:
|
ESA95 measures output at basic prices.
ESA95 applies market prices for transactions.
ESA95 (para 1.36) states that non-monetary transactions are also included in the system.
ESA95 measures output, not sales. However in practice sales (with an appropriate inventory adjustment) are often used to determine output.
ESA95 (para 4.50) states that interest should be recorded as accruing continuously over time to the creditor on the amount of the principal outstanding.
ESA95 (para 4.55) says that dividends should be recorded at the time they are due to be paid, as determined by the corporation. |
|
IAS 19: Employee benefits
This IAS looks at different types of employees benefits (note that IAS26 complements this IAS on retirement plans):
Short-term employee benefits (wages, salaries, short term absences, profit sharing and bonuses, non-monetary benefits). These should be measured as an expense when an employee has rendered service to an enterprise, except for profit sharing and bonuses where recording is at the point an enterprise has an obligation to pay and a reliable estimate can be made.
Post-employment benefits (pension plans and medical plans) are divided into defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans.
Other long term employee benefits (long term absence or disability payments, any compensation paid more than 12 months after the period in which the work was done) are recorded in the balance sheet as a liability at the net present value (the defined benefit standards apply if there are any associated assets).
Termination benefits should be recognised as an expense when the enterprise is demonstrably committed to terminate employment of employee(s) or to payments under a voluntary redundancy scheme. |
ESA95 (para 4.02) defines compensation of employees as total remuneration, in cash or in kind, payable by an employer to an employee in return for work done by the latter during the accounting period.
ESA95 (para 4.03) states that compensation of employees should be recorded gross of any social contributions or taxes payable by the employee. ESA95 (para 4.12) allows ad-hoc bonuses and other exceptional payments to be recorded when they are due to be paid. ESA95 (Annex III) treats the reserves of pension funds as assets of households. Property income arising is treated as paid to households, who then make supplementary contributions.
For private social insurance schemes, companies are recorded as making actual social contributions on behalf of their employees
For unfunded social schemes, companies are treated as making imputed social contributions on behalf of their employees. In theory the imputed social contribution should be set by reference to the companies’ obligations to its staff. In practice the contribution is usually set equal to benefits paid.
In ESA95 there is no distinction between long-term and short-term compensation of employees.
ESA95 (para 4.12) allows ad-hoc bonuses and other exceptional payments to be recorded when they are due to be paid. |
|
IAS20: Accounting for government grants and disclosure of government assistance
This IAS ensures that government grants (including non-monetary grants) should not be recognised until there is reasonable assurance that the enterprise will comply with the conditions attached and that the grants will be received
Government grants should be recognised as income so that they are matched with the related costs which they are intended to meet (the "income approach"). But any grants awarded for "giving immediate financial support" to an enterprise can be measured, possibly as an extraordinary item, in the period when the enterprise qualifies for it.
Government grants related to assets can be recognised as deferred income, or as reduced depreciation charge on the asset concerned.
Grants can either be presented as a separate income item or as netted off the expenditure to which they relate, though the IAS has a preference for the first treatment.
|
ESA95 describes grants to businesses as subsidies (D3), investment grants (D92) and other capital transfers (D99). Subsidies are to be recorded when the transaction or event which gives rise to the payment occurs.
ESA95 (paras 4.162 and 4.166) specifies that investment grants and other capital transfers are to be recorded when payment is due to be made (or when the ownership of the asset is transferred if an investment grant in kind).
ESA95 records investment grants gross of capital formation as receivables by the unit.
ESA95 records all subsidies, investment grants and other capital grants gross. |
|
IAS 21: The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates
A foreign currency transaction should be recorded by applying the exchange rate between the reporting currency and the foreign currency on the date of the transaction.
Any foreign currency monetary items in the balance sheet should be reported using the closing exchange rate.
Treatment of investment in foreign operations varies:
The IAS establishes disclosure requirements of any exchange rate differences included in profit/loss and in equity. |
ESA95 (para 6.58) requires that any transactions in financial assets in foreign currency must be converted using exchange rates at the time the transactions occur.
ESA95 (para 7.31) specifies that assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies should be converted at the market exchange rate prevailing on the date of the balance sheet.
ESA95 (paras 4.64 – 4.67) define reinvested earnings on direct foreign investment (where investors own more than 10%). Retained earnings are treated as if they were distributed and remitted to investors in proportion to equity holding, and then reinvested by them. Reinvested earnings should be recorded when they are earned. ESA95 does not specify a specific exchange rate to be applied in this case. |
|
IAS 27: Consolidated Financial Statements and accounting for investments in subsidiaries
This IAS sets out the requirements for a parent company to prepare consolidated financial statements, including all of its subsidiaries. Subsidiaries may be domestic or foreign and are controlled through a shareholding of at least 50% of voting power, or where the parent has de facto control through statute, agreement or ability to appoint or remove the majority of board members. Subsidiaries excluded from consolidation are those purchased and held with a view to disposal in the near future, or those where there are severe long-term restrictions on transferring funds to the parent.
Consolidation should include the following:
Consolidated statements should use a common accounting system for all like transactions. In the individual accounts of the parent, investments in subsidiaries can be measured at cost, using the equity method in IAS28, or as an available-for-sale financial asset as described in IAS39. |
ESA95 defines several different levels of unit in chapter 2. Paragraph 2.13 says that:
Control is defined in ESA95 (para 2.26) as the ownership of more than half the voting shares, or otherwise controlling over half the voting power. Control can be exercised indirectly.
ESA95 (para 1.58) says that for sub-sectors or sectors, flows and stocks are not consolidated between constituent units. ESA95 records any property income paid by one unit to another as a gross use. ESA95 (para 3.15) says that the total output of an institutional unit comprised of more than one local KAU is the sum of the outputs of the local KAUs, including outputs delivered by component local KAUs.
Equity investments by one business in another business are measured at market price or nearest equivalent. |
| IAS28: Accounting for
investments in associates
This IAS defines an associate as an enterprise in which the investor has significant influence (more than 20% of the voting rights) and which is neither a subsidiary nor a joint venture of the investor.
An investment in an associate must be recorded under the "equity method". The investment is initially booked at cost value and then adjusted to reflect the share of the investor in profits and losses after acquisition.
When an investor ceases to have influence, or the associate operates under long-term restrictions impairing its ability to transfer funds to the investor, then a cost approach should be used. |
ESA95 allows for equity investments to be held between businesses. There is no concept of an associate.
Undistributed profits are generally not shown as increasing equity – the value of equity in ESA95 should be made with reference to a market price.
The exception to this in ESA95 is the case of re-invested earnings on foreign direct investment foreign (paras 4.64 to 4.67). FDI enterprises are defined with a 10% shareholding-voting power threshold. Retained earnings of FDI enterprise re treated as if they are distributed and then reinvested in equity. |
|
IAS 30: Disclosures in the Financial Statements of banks and similar financial institutions
This IAS establishes specific reporting requirements for banks, in addition to those required under IAS1.
In the income statement, income and expenses should be grouped by nature. The following items should be specifically disclosed for banks:
Interest and similar income; Interest expense and similar charges; Dividend income; Fee and commission income; Fee and commission expense; Gains less losses arising from dealing securities; Gains less losses arising from investment securities; Gains less losses arising from dealing in foreign currencies; Other operating income; Losses on loans and advances; General administrative expenses; and Other operating expenses. Losses on loans which have been identified should be recorded as an expense. A bank may set aside additional amounts for losses, which should not be treated as an expense but rather an appropriation of retained earnings. |
ESA95 (paras 1.58 and 1.59) requires that transactions should not be netted off. The presentation of the sector accounts requires interest to be separated into resources and uses.
ESA95 (para 3.63) specifies that:
ESA95 (para 4.165) says that the writing-off of debt is not a transaction, and should be recorded in other changes in volume of assets (as K10). |
|
IAS 36: Impairment of assets
This IAS requires that the recoverable value of an asset should be estimated whenever there is an indication that an asset may be impaired (it does not apply however to certain assets covered in other IAS).
Impairment is identified when the carrying amount of an asset (defined according to IAS 16) falls below its recoverable amount.
There are two ways to record the impairment in the income account:
An impaired asset should be valued at the higher of its "value in use" or its "net selling price".
The "net selling price" is ideally the observed market price for the asset in its existing state less any incremental costs associated with the disposal of the asset.
The "value in use" relies on the estimation of future cash flows associated with the asset, and applying an appropriate discount rate. The IAS gives detailed guidance on this calculation.
An impairment loss may be reversed (up to the value the asset would have reached had it not been considered impaired before). This reversal would be recorded either as income or as an increase in the revaluation surplus.
There is a requirement that any impairment losses or reversals recognised in the income statement (and also impacting on equity) should be separately identified. |
ESA95 (para 7.25) says that fixed assets are valued in the balance sheet as if they were acquired on the balance sheet date (ie. at market values).
ESA95 allows three different ways in which the value of an asset may change – consumption of fixed capital, revaluation, and other changes ion volume of assets.
ESA95 (para 6.02) defines consumption of fixed capital as amount of assets used up, during the period under consideration, as a result of normal wear and tear and foreseeable obsolescence. Consumption of fixed capital appears in the other changes in volume of assets account (and also in any net aggregates).
ESA95 (para 6.35) says that nominal holding gains and losses as arise from changes in the level and structure of their prices.
ESA95 (para 3.115) records sales of fixed assets in gross fixed capital formation at basic prices after deducting costs of ownership transfer |
|
IAS 37: Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
This IAS defines provisions as liabilities of uncertain timing or amount. By contrast contingent liabilities are those assets and liabilities whose existence can only be determined by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more future events.
A provision should be recognised when an enterprise has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of economic resources will be needed to settle the event, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. A provision may not include gains from the expected disposal of an asset.
Provisions are separately identified in the balance sheet and changes in provisions impact on the income statement.
A contingent liability must be disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is remote. However it must not be included in the financial statements until it is virtually certain to arise. |
ESA95 does not include the concept of provisions.
ESA95 (para 7.22) specifies that contingent assets should not be recorded in the system unless a contractual arrangement itself has market value and can be offset on the market. |
|
IAS 38: Intangible Assets
This IAS defines which intangible assets can be capitalised in business accounts and how they should be valued and depreciated. The IAS does not deal with mineral rights and exploration expenditure, financial assets or insurance contract related intangible assets.
An intangible asset should be recognised only if it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the enterprise, and the cost of the asset can be measured reliably. The acquisition of an intangible asset will usually satisfy these criteria (though during some business acquisitions it may not be possible to separate this element).
An intangible asset should be measured initially at cost (cost of acquisition of an enterprise acquires the asset).
Certain items should never be recorded as an asset – internally generated goodwill, any expenditure during the research phase of a project, internally generated brands, titles, customer lists and similar items.
The IAS allows the recording of development expenditure as an asset so long as a strict list of criteria are satisfied (notably technical feasibility is assured and the enterprise intends, and is capable of, completing the development for own use or sale).
For continuing recording in the balance sheet, the benchmark treatment is to value an intangible asset at its cost less any accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. The alternative treatment is to carry the asset at its fair value (with reference to a market). The rules here are almost identical with those contained in IAS 16.
An intangible asset should be depreciated over its useful life. There is a rebuttable presumption that the useful life of an intangible asset will not exceed 20 years.
A recoverable amount should be estimated for all intangible assets at least at each financial year end (this is tougher than IAS 36).
Gains or losses arising from disposal of intangible assets should be determined as the difference between net sale proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset. These gains and losses are shown in the income statement. |
ESA95 (annex 7.1) shows the following intangible assets included:
ESA95 (para 3.113) says that gross fixed capital formation is valued at purchasers’ prices plus the costs of ownership transfer. For own-account capital formation, its is valued at the basic prices of similar assets on the market (in effect sum of costs plus a mark-up for net operating surplus). Other possible valuation bases include present value of estimated future returns, and production costs (for entertainment literary or artistic originals)
ESA95 (para 3.70e) says that all research and development expenditure is to be expensed.
ESA95 (para 6.03) specifies that consumption of fixed capital should be calculated for all intangible fixed assets.
ESA95 does not record holding gains and losses in output or income. |
|
IAS 40: Investment property
This IAS distinguishes investment property from other types of property. Investment property is defined as a land or building (or both) held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or for both.
Investment property should only be recognised if it is probable that future economic benefits attributable to the asset will flow to the enterprise, and the cost of the property can be measured reliably.
The IAS allows enterprises to choose between measuring the property at fair value or at cost.
For fair value, a gain or a loss arising should be included in the net profit or loss for the period. Fair value does not require that disposal costs should be included, and should be judged against an active market or closest equivalent.
The cost approach is as described in IAS 16. |
ESA95 does not distinguish the accounting treatment of investment or other property. |
|
IAS 41: Agriculture
This IAS specifies the treatment of biological assets, the agricultural produce at point of harvest, and any associated government grants.
A biological asset should be measured on initial recognition and at each balance sheet date at its fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs. Agricultural produce harvested from an enterprise’s own biological assets should also be measured as fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs.
The fair value of these items should be unaffected by any forward contract signed
Any gain or loss arising from initial recognition of these items (eg. a new-born calf) should be included in the profit or loss for that period.
If a biological asset cannot be reliably valued at fair value, it should be valued at cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
An unconditional government grant on a biological asset should be recognised as income when it becomes receivable. A conditional government grants should only be recognised when the enterprise meets the required conditions. |
ESA95 (para 3.58) specifies that the output of agricultural products should be recorded continuously over the entire period of production (with growing crops, standing timber and animals raised for slaughter being recorded as work in progress).
ESA95 (para 3.48) defines the basic price as the price receivable by the producers from the purchaser. ESA95 includes new-born animals in output.
ESA95 (para 6.03) specifies that consumption of fixed capital should not be calculated for animals.
ESA95 (para 4.39) says subsidies are to be recorded when the transaction or event which gives rise to the payment occurs. ESA95 (paras 4.162 and 4.166) specifies that investment grants and other capital transfers are to be recorded when payment is due to be made (or when the ownership of the asset is transferred if an investment grant in kind). |